MASS STRANDINGS OF WHALES AND DOLPHINS IN CAPE COD BAY

by Captain David Williams
Deafwhale Society, Inc
PO Box 319, Dumaguete City
6200 Oriental Negros
Philippines
![]()
Copyright Notice: The Seaquake Theory to explain why whales mass strand revealed in these pages is the copyrighted intellectual creation of Captain David Williams and took over 30 years to fully develop. As such, this work is fully protected by international copyright laws. Copyright © 1977 thru 2008. Reproduction and use of any part or all of this intellectual creation in any form, including film, is prohibited. In particular, no part of these web pages may be distributed or copied for any commercial purpose, especially for commercial film purposes. No part of Captain David Williams' intellectual property may be reproduced on or transmitted to or stored in any other web site, or in any other form of electronic retrieval system or used in any film; however, you may link to this web site without permission. Requests for any other use should be sent in the first instance to Captain David Williams. Reference this webpage as the source when quoting this article. (Click here to learn the consequence of trying to steal this material)
CAPE COD
(CHECK THIS SITE ONE WEEK AFTER THE NEXT STRANDING ON CAPE COD)
The chart above is a graphic illustration of the seaquake epicenters along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge as determined by undersea hydrophones during 325 days of 2002. The area of interested for Cape Cod Bay strandings is a whale and dolphin habitat located ~600 miles north and ~1000 miles south of Iceland. In this area is where all the whales and dolphins that mass strand on Cape Cod hang out in September October and November. If a pod were injured by a seaquake near Iceland or near Jan Mayen Island, it would travel with the oceanic currents that flow from the area and has a great chance of ending in Cape Cod Bay.
To see if there were any seaquake activity in the area that might account for the high number of strandings in Cape Cod Bay in November, December, and January of the 2005-2006 stranding season, the data at ANSS Catalog was search north of Iceland with the following parameters are:
catalog=ANSS
start time=2005/09/01 end time=2005/12/31
minimum latitude=65.0 maximum latitude=75.0
minimum longitude=-25.0 maximum longitude=15.0
minimum magnitude=3.0 maximum magnitude=8.0
minimum depth=01.0 km maximum depth=100.0 km
Potentially harmful events were as follows:
Date Time Lat Lon Dep Mag Nst ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2005/09/02 00:21:48.62 72.6030 4.0560 10.00 4.30 Mb 32 2005/09/02 00:35:23.43 72.6560 3.8050 10.00 4.50 Mb 91 2005/09/02 00:36:58.78 72.6670 4.0160 10.00 4.00 Mb 21 2005/09/02 00:49:50.11 72.6500 3.9450 10.00 4.20 Mb 52 2005/09/09 15:36:43.56 73.2770 7.0820 10.00 4.30 Mb 30 2005/09/09 21:10:18.90 73.2780 6.1690 10.00 4.30 Mb 45 2005/09/13 02:50:59.71 71.1000 -7.4280 10.00 4.30 Mb 111 2005/10/04 17:51:39.29 71.0900 -7.6960 19.70 3.60 ML 18 2005/10/10 06:56:57.70 71.2200 -6.5840 15.00 3.80 ML 9 2005/10/19 09:01:10.02 70.9280 -6.8420 10.00 4.30 Mb 68 2005/10/19 12:32:38.21 70.8980 -6.9060 10.00 4.30 ML 36 2005/11/06 22:18:19.09 71.3030 -6.0240 10.00 3.30 ML 14 2005/11/07 01:49:38.39 71.6890 -12.0640 23.60 5.00 Mb 207 2005/11/12 17:01:37.32 68.8860 -17.1760 10.00 4.90 Mb 139 2005/11/19 20:09:47.93 71.5680 -3.7560 10.00 3.80 Mb 20 2005/12/04 04:14:31.46 72.0390 -0.6430 10.00 4.40 Mb 49 2005/12/16 12:24:59.70 71.5700 -11.0260 10.00 3.80 Mb 19 2005/12/22 08:49:27.95 72.1440 0.8860 10.00 4.10 Mb 18 2005/12/30 16:48:24.55 73.4100 7.8650 10.00 3.80 Mb 12
The same time frame was used in a search South of Iceland using the following parameters:
catalog=ANSS
start time=2005/09/01 end time=2005/12/31
minimum latitude=45.0 maximum latitude=65.0
minimum longitude=-40.0 maximum longitude=-20.0
minimum magnitude=3.0 maximum magnitude=8.0
minimum depth=01.0 km maximum depth=100.0 km
The most suspicious events were as follows:
Date Time Lat Lon Dep Mag Magt Nst ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2005/09/01 11:09:24.52 45.8510 -27.8210 10.00 4.50 Mb 15 2005/09/14 11:23:52.80 47.2510 -27.1430 10.00 4.40 Mb 33 2005/09/14 11:32:04.96 47.6570 -27.2500 10.00 4.20 Mb 26 2005/09/28 03:58:28.70 62.2910 -26.0710 10.00 4.50 Mb 32 2005/10/08 20:03:30.25 47.1870 -26.9570 10.00 4.30 Mb 25 2005/11/22 11:51:10.55 51.7910 -31.3280 10.00 4.10 Mb 12 2005/12/02 08:40:16.93 52.9070 -34.6260 10.00 4.70 Mb 147 2005/12/09 02:32:47.82 45.4520 -27.7600 10.00 4.10 Mb 62 2005/12/19 19:16:58.59 52.7210 -34.8150 10.00 4.60 Mb 170 2005/12/30 06:26:12.72 57.1470 -33.8400 10.00 4.20 Mb 14
None of the events above are shown as less than 10 km deep. This is unusual and likely indicates that the recording equipment is limited. The general rule here is that a seaquake of equal magnitude will emit more energy in the water at lesser depths. For example, it might be that a magnitude 5 seaquake might cause twice as much disturbance in the water at 8 km than at 10 km. Depth is likely to be MORE determinative of injury than magnitude.
Cape Cod is the leading stranding site in the US because its geographical land mass serves as a giant catching
arm for pods moving with the flow (Williams 1987). It is located about 2,600 miles down stream from Iceland and from the Reykjanes Ridge, a known pilot whale habitat. Oxygen isotope analysis of the shelf water off Cape Cod (Chapman 1989) indicates the water originated off Iceland in support of this theory.
The giant catching arm of Cape Cod is typical of major stranding sites around the globe as noted by Brabyn (1992) in New Zealand. All major sites have geographical protrusions that oppose the current, and they all are located at the right distance down stream from seismically-active pelagic whale territories to allow time for the whales to lose their ability to avoid a stranding as noted earlier.
Cape Cod received a lot of mass strandings in December 2005 and January 2006. (Stranding on Cape Cod)
The dolphins arriving in late January died almost as soon as they hit the beach so there is a good chance these animals spent more than the average 65 days at sea since their injury. Thus, if this theory is correct, then these dolphin were injured in November along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge somewhere near Iceland since this area is the nearest seismically-active upstream habitat for the species in question.
In support, the cool, clear North Atlantic waters both north and south of Iceland are teeming with the same whales and dolphins that usually strand on Cape Cod beaches.
A check of the seismic data above and below Iceland reveals 15 possible earthquakes (see above). Six of these events are highly suspect since they are shallow, powerful, and occurred at night during prime feeding hours.
The current is also showing much change over the last few decades so this could be a possible explanation for the increased stranding this year. Currents in the North Atlantic The West Greenland Current How Much Excess Fresh Water Was Added to the North Atlantic in Recent Decades? NASA - Top Story - SATELLITES RECORD WEAKENING NORTH ATLANTIC CURRENT - April 15, 2004.
Studying these current patterns will show that whales and dolphins injured around Iceland and Greenland could very well end up on the beaches of Cape Cod. Cape Cod might also be getting more strandings this year because of local wind patterns further north. The wind might be keeping pods that would strand in Canada offshore until they reach Cape Cod. Science Daily: Winds, Ice Motion Root Cause Of Decline In Sea Ice, Not Warmer Temperatures
The Arctic Oscillation is a seesaw pattern in which atmospheric pressure at the polar and middle latitudes fluctuates between positive and negative phases. The wind patterns associated with the Arctic Oscillation affect the surface winds and temperature over North America and Eurasia, as well as the Arctic.
The Arctic Oscillation was in an extreme "high," or positive, phase in the early '90s and is generally in a moderate phase today. Rigor and John M. Wallace, UW professor of atmospheric sciences, say the extreme high caused winds at the surface to circulate in ways that blew most of the thicker, older ice out of the Arctic Ocean into the Atlantic. "It was as if winds generated in response to the Arctic Oscillation in those years became a far bigger 'broom' sweeping ice out of the arctic," Rigor says.
Another reason for the increase in strandings of smaller pods might be a drop in the shark population. More healthy populations of predators in previous years would naturally have culled the smaller pods long before they reached the beach.
References:
Brabyn, Mark W., Ian G. McLean (1992) Oceanography and Coastal Topography of Herd-Stranding Sites for Whales in New Zealand, J. Mammalogy 73(3): 469-476
Chapman, D.C., R.C. Beardsley (1989) On the Origin of Shelf Water in the Middle Atlantic Bight, J. Physical Oceanography V19 P384
Williams, David W. (1988) Auditory Trauma as the Major Factor in Whale Strandings, Report Submitted to the US Marine Mammal Commission 17 October, 1988